One challenge, solved the real way.
Can You Build? hands every candidate the same interactive challenge and an AI to direct — exactly how the work is done now. You watch how they think, then judge the work, not the wording.
What is Can You Build?
Design the challenge
Describe the role; AI drafts an interactive scenario and its scoring rubric. You review, adjust, and stage it — authored fresh per campaign, not pulled from a bank.
Candidates direct an AI
An opaque link, a timer, and an AI assistant. The candidate works the problem by directing the model — and the full transcript of how they reason is captured.
Judge on the evidence
You get a scored report: per-criterion scores with the AI's reasoning, tied to the transcript. A named reviewer records the call — and exports the trail.
The two AI-assisted steps sit inside your existing pipeline — the rest of hiring stays exactly as it is. See how scoring works →
A link, a timer, and a fair shot.
Candidates open an opaque link — no signup, no CV, no webcam, no screen recording. The criteria are shown before the timer starts.
Same challenge, same timer, and the same per-stage budget of AI replies — shown live. The clock only starts when the candidate says go.
The AI partner is a general model, so most candidates can reason with it in the language they think in.
No names. No emails. No CVs. We never learn who your candidates are.
Every candidate is an opaque link token — there is no field anywhere
in the product for a name, an email, or a CV. Your organisation keeps
the link-to-person mapping on its own side; Can You Build? holds the
assessment, not the identity. No webcam, no microphone, no screen
recording, no keystroke logging. Unused links expire, and deleting a
campaign cascades to its sessions, transcripts, and evaluations.
It is still personal data — pseudonymous, not anonymous — and we'll
sign a DPA saying so. It's just a very short list:
see exactly what we hold →
AI assists. People decide. Every call is on the record.
Evaluating candidates with AI is high-risk under the EU AI Act — regulated, not banned. Can You Build? is built around the safeguards it expects: a named reviewer makes every decision, and the rubric, transcript, and notes form an exportable trail. It never decides on its own — and because assessments are text-only and carry no identity, there's no emotion inference, biometrics, or social scoring in the picture.
Built around the Act's oversight, transparency, and auditability safeguards. Informational, not legal advice; full compliance depends on how you deploy it.
- ✗ Auto-accepts or rejects candidates
- ✗ Infers emotion or uses biometrics
- ✗ Hides the scoring criteria from your team
Try it on one real role.
A pilot: fixed scope, a defined end date. Judge the work for yourself.